Archive for May, 2010
Fitness Regimen Calisthenics Exercises
All types of exercises are essential for our body fitness. To do exercise is good for to maintain health in the proper way. So it is vey essential for the day to day life. In some times some exercises are used for to cure the disease. There are so many types of the exercises are present. In which different types of exercises are do for different purposes. The exercises are like jogging military pushup jump squat lunge duck walk plyometric lunge power jumpingjack crunches bicycle exercise and triceps dips.
The calisthenics exercise is related with the body weight. And it is done to improve fitness health and physical strength endurance flexibility to build muscle and keep in shape. These exercises concentrate on specific areas of the body. The calisthenics is related of freearm aesthetics rhythmic folk dance singing marching clubswinging and metal rod exercises. Calisthenics exercises are consisting the movements of which use the weight of your body as resistance to work against.
The calisthenics exercise is a valuable effective and efficient training method. For the calisthenics exercises there are so many trainings also available in which they will give proper guidence for the exercise. Calisthenics exercise is evaluated each with specific time parameters and specific exercise form mechanics. They do not require expensive equipment. So by doing these type of calisthenics exercises we can improve our health ability.
Benefits of Calisthenics Exercises
To improve heart health
Lower risk of cardiovascular disease
To reduce weight
To increase muscular endurance
To get attractive body shape
Muscle strength
About the writer: Rachel Broune writes articles for Depression. He also writes for Man’s Health and Vitamins and Minerals
Fitness Fix: What If Fitness Were Solved?
I have always loved to play “whatif” games. “Whatif” games have been the great pastime of inventors and business people since ancient times.
“What if we used electricity the same way farmers plow fields one row at a time? Could we send pictures?”
The guy who invented TV was plowing a field when he had that idea.
“What if there were a computer in every home and it was running our software?”
Bill Gates wondered that when he was in high school at a time when computers weighed tons.
“What if we tried to put a man on the moon and bring him back in this decade? Could we do it?”
John Kennedy asked that question of NASA in 1961 and in 1969 we did.
So here’s one I bet you have never considered:
“What if fitness were solved? What would that look like?”
Grandma and Grandpa would compete in the Tour de France. The only question for sports would be who’s been training longest and any of us would be able to do what only the best of us can now do.
If fitness were solved then you wouldn’t go to the gym and say “I’m looking to get in shape.” You’d go and say “My left bicep needs to be a halfinch bigger. And I need to lose 5 pounds of fat from just over my belly button but keep the fat just under my shoulder blades because having it there makes it more comfortable when I lean back in my chair.”
The reason I ask that “whatif” question is that people already treat fitness like it is solved and it isn’t. Fitness isn’t solved anything like the way Jenner’s smallpox vaccine solved smallpox. I mean the smallpox vaccine may not be perfect but it sure has a better track record no pun intended than any fitness program.
Why?
I don’t know the answer for certain but I can tell you what I think it is. I think people don’t use the right words. More specifically they don’t use words that are specific enough.
Fitness is a very broad term and means different things to different people. There’s just no way to be sure that you are achieving what you hope to achieve when you use words that are that broad.
A computer on every desktopthat means something. Pictures transmitted through the airthat means something. But “Fitness”? That doesn’t really mean anything.
So how about this: “A body that performs better than it did last year runs a mile faster jumps higher swims farther every single year.”
That’s what it would look like. That’s solved.
Until fitness can offer that it’s just one of those words like the economy or transportation that means whatever you want it to mean but doesn’t mean anything useful. It doesn’t mean anything you can reliablypredictablyaccomplish anything with.
What if there were a word we could use? I’ve got a word for you. The word is bioese. Bioese which rhymes with Japanese is the language you use to communicate with your body and that your body uses to communicate with you.
Here’s what solved fitness is like:
> “Arm add 2 inches of muscle and lose onequarter inch of body fat.”
> “Lungs use oxygen 20 better so that I can load this truck up during the day without being too tired to dance in the evening.”
There are commands that you can give your body. And there are many times when you speak to your body and you speak the wrong language.
For instance many people go on starvation diets thinking they are telling their body to lose unwanted bodyfat. But that’s not what their body hears. The body notices you are not eating and it hears “There’s a famine. I need to store up body fat and lose all this muscle because it uses too many calories.”
Fitness is probably a much smaller problem than transmitting pictures through the air or putting a man on the moon or a computer in every home. But only if we start treating it like a solvable problem and solve it.
We can if we give it the attention it deserves and stop using terms that don’t help us.
“Body Mass Index” is a term that someone came up with to mean “People can’t be bothered to find out their lean mass and fat mass ratio so let’s make up a different term that people still don’t understand but that also doesn’t solve any problems for people.”
There are fitness terms that are well understood. If you know them and use them you can already achieve results far better than most people imagine. Learn the meanings of terms like Fast Twitch Fiber Lean Mass Body Fat Percentage and Exercise Intensity. And use them.
Fitness isn’t solved yet but it can be.
About the writer: Tony Reno long known for successful RD worked the past decade using the same practical science skills to produce reliable fitness solutions. All of fitness isn’t solved yet but some of it is. If you enjoyed this article and would like to find out what it feels like to get your body to respond very directly to your efforts click the link to claim your FREE 20page Preview of the popular “Peak Exercise” eBook.
FDA Report Cards: School Lunches
While the GMA has endorsed the idea in principle we struggle to imagine the consumer implied by the concept. Let us imagine the kind of person for whom such a report card is designed:
This is a consumer who analyzes health claims of new products in a scientific fashion at the shelf.
This is a consumer who understands the difference between “Moderate Evidence” “Some Evidence” and “Little Evidence” when contemplating a health claim.
This is a consumer who believes that this kind of evidentiary information in the absence of any contextual information is to be understood literally.
This is a consumer who looks up to the FDA the government public policy officials and food companies to tell them what “healthy” means and what is healthy or unhealthy about the food they love.Our ethnographic research shows time and time again that most Americans don’t really care what the FDA says about the healthiness of food and beverage products. And they don’t care about the food pyramid as they eat during the day or when they go grocery shopping. They value the FDA to regulate the safety of our food supply not its relative healthiness or the truthfulness of marketing campaigns. Consumers don’t feel dependent on the government to be skeptical on their behalf.
The consumer that this report card concept implies is a consumer that in our opinion simply doesn’t exist. Consumers do not and can not act as little food scientists in the harried process of shopping cooking and eating as everyday people. Consumers also do not look up to food companies to learn how to be healthy or to the government to protect them from the former’s “misleading” health claims. They see themselves as the final arbiter of the legitimacy of health claims even when they simply don’t have the knowledge necessary to really be making such determinations. This will always be the case to some extent just as many consumers will never floss their teeth no matter how many lectures they receive from dental hygienists.
In a culture where consumers are increasingly empowered and defining themselves as the expert marketers and food companies should not overestimate the role of objective scientific truth in the CPG transaction. What matters is what consumers believe to be true because this is generally what they will act upon as purchasers regardless of contradictory information they’ve heard from the FDA. The only times that FDA contradictions of foodrelated health claims tend to correlate highly with consumer behavior are when 1 the FDA issues safety related warnings e.g. “you might die if you eat this…” and 2 when a consumer hasn’t yet come to believe a certain foodrelated health claim him/herself. In the latter case the FDA ends up reassuring them that “I was right after all about that nonsense.”
We find that as consumers become more wellnessoriented they often discount the FDA in favor of trendier sources of nutrition information. While the latter sources may not be scientific at all they become symbolic aids in the pursuit of a health lifestyle that they define not a healthy lifestyle defined by big business or by the government.
Lesson for CPG Food companies
CPG companies at the cusp of entering the health and wellness arena need to think less literally about their opportunities and learn how to analyze what different kinds of wellness consumers are looking for in terms of “health cues” not what is objectively healthy. Indirect cues of healthiness freshness naturalness local minimally processed artisanal indigenous etc. are not only more effective marketing tools but they also help companies steer clear of the FDA’s ire by making misleading or weakly supported health claims in the effort to be the guys with next “big claim.”
The ever constant pursuit of a scientifically valid functional food health claim is draining the resources of CPG food companies when more vague health cues are all that is necessary and can save companies from legal problems that inevitably arise when the “science” changes surrounding their product’s health claim and they have thousands of facings all across America suddenly making “false” claims.
This is why we advise against overly targeted health claims at all for CPG food products which tends to invite the ire of the FDA and regulatory agencies and motivates them to come up with crazy ideas like a report card.
Instead we advise that companies think about:
The story behind its production and ingredient sourcing where did we get our raw ingredients and how hard did we work to find them? andGrounding their “healthy” products in what the consumer sees as the natural order of things not the order of nutritional science and food engineering
About the writer:nbsp;nbsp;Isabel Curini is a fitness trainer and editor at http://www.healthfitnessworld.com.
HealthFitnessWorld.com is dedicated to providing highquality free advices tips and resources on health fitness body building supplements nutrition weight loss beauty massage acne medicine depression massage.
HealthFitnessWorld.com Fitness Body Building Exercise Weight Loss Nutrition Articles and Resources.
This article may be reprinted or published without the author’s consent as long as the “About” and “weblinks” are kept intact and active.